09.04.08

Undecided Women Voters Turned Off By Palin

Posted in News! at 9:58 am by Anna

I wouldn’t say I was totally turned off. I would say somewhat. I hate the idea of attacking a woman running for VP, but hate even more, the idea that John McCain may think he can manipulate my thinking just by choosing a woman as a running mate. Thanks John, but I’m not that easy.

She obviously prides herself on being a “pitbull” & the Repubs seem to love that about her. But it seems her sarcasm is backfiring. I don’t like when people are mean, it’s a turn-off. And it’s easy to attack a Democrat in a room full of Republicans…But what would she really contribute to the White House? Has she answered that question??

Here are results of a focus group done with undecided women voters in Nevada:
Posted by the Huffington Post

In two different focus groups of Clinton-supporting Nevada women — married and unmarried — conducted immediately after Gov. Sarah Palin’s Wednesday night speech to the Republican National Convention, a few common reactions quickly took shape.

First, women in both groups were impressed with Palin’s speaking ability and poise. But they were hardly convinced that she was qualified to be vice president, or that she truly represented the “change” they were looking for, especially in light of what was deemed an overly harsh “sarcasm” pervading her address.

The (mostly) anonymous proceedings were webcast live to reporters, who were told in a press release that the Nevada focus groups would include “some former Hillary Clinton supporters who are now undecided or are weak supporters of Barack Obama or John McCain.” No party identification was made available, though the approximately two dozen women were reportedly between 30 and 60 years old.

In the “married” group, when one attendee kicked off the discussion by saying “she’s a good speaker, and a crowd pleaser,” the rest of the room articulated their agreement. “I didn’t expect to be as impressed as I was,” said another respondent. But then another woman added: “Once she started mudslinging, I thought, it’s the same old crap as other politicians. McCain used her to get the women’s vote. And she’s using McCain.”

“Thank you,” another woman responded. “That really upset me; there was no need for that. It was snippy.”

The unmarried group also voiced similar objections to the harsh, partisan edge of Palin’s remarks. “I’m not impressed with her at all as a person,” one said, citing her “finger pointing” and general sarcasm after the group had generally agreed that she was a talented public speaker.

Still not all focus group members thought Palin came off too harsh. “She didn’t seem very aggressive to me at all,” said one unmarried participant.

But in both groups, narrow majorities said they held a more negative view of Palin after her speech. “She comes off pretty cutthroat,” said one.

On other issues, women in both groups said they wanted to hear more of Palin’s own policy views, outside the realm of energy. Education, heath care, the economy and Iraq were all cited as areas in which women were hungry for more information — especially in light of McCain’s age. “I think America is concerned, because of McCain’s age, that we’re gonna have a female president who’s maybe inexperienced. The nation needs to know what her issues are,” said one married respondent, which prompted another to add: “I don’t think she’s got what it takes.” An unmarried participant said she had yet to hear enough “in regards to her personal views, which could be implicated on us if McCain was to die.”

When prompted to respond to Palin’s steadfast opposition to abortion — even in cases of rape or incest — no woman in either group stepped forward to defend the Alaskan Republican. “I don’t dig that,” said one married woman, matter of factly.

But there were other points on which the participants expressed pride in Palin’s achievement. “She earned what she’s got — as far as not marrying into it. I like that about her,” said one married respondent. “Let’s hope she has a good showing,” said another who had expressed disappointment over Palin’s abortion views.

The groups — which were coordinated by Anna Greenberg and Stan Greenberg of Greenberg, Quinlan, Rosner Research — were commissioned by the Women’s Voices/Women Vote Action Fund, which describes itself as “dedicated to encouraging unmarried women to bring their voices to our nation’s political conversation and to advocate for policies important to them.”

2 Comments »

  1. Judy said,

    September 6, 2008 at 10:44 pm

    I’m a Canadian woman - and I now live in the UK, so maybe my opinion isn’t too important in the scheme of things - except - oh yeah - if elected this woman could end up running one of the world’s most powerful nations. This thought makes my blood go funny and goosebumps arrive on my arms. I’m a liberal - if I were American I would most likely be a card-carrying Democrat. I do like some of the things that John McCain says and he seems to walk the talk as much as any politician can. But his choice of this woman for VP has made me re-think all this. Surely my American sisters won’t vote for this ticket merely because one person on it has ovaries?

  2. Anna said,

    September 7, 2008 at 1:21 pm

    I agree Judy, I seem to have lost respect for John McCain since he chose Palin.

Leave a Comment

Design by Beccary and Weblogs.us · XHTML · CSS